Mason Law
 (617)-658-3018
  • Home
  • Employment Law
    • Employee Rights >
      • Unemployment
      • Employment Discrimination >
        • Reasonable Accomodations
      • Massachusetts Wage and Overtime Rights
      • Severance Agreements
      • Wrongful Termination
    • Employers
  • Attorney Mason
  • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Massachusetts Employment Lawyer Blog

Associational Discrimination

10/23/2013

0 Comments

 
      Is it legal under Massachusetts state law for an employer to discriminate against an employee for his or her association with a disabled person? The answer is a resounding "no."  In Flagg v. Alimed, 466 Mass 23 (2013), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that an employer is prohibited from discriminating  against an employee based on his association with a handicapped individual.
      In Flagg, the plaintiff employee, Marc Flagg, had a wife with a disabling brain tumor.  The employer terminated Flagg when his wife was in the hospital, resulting in an immediate cancellation of his family's health insurance.  Flagg alleged that the employer terminated him because his wife had a serious and costly medical condition, which had rendered her totally disabled, for which the employer, through its health plan, was financially responsible.   He alleged that his employer had terminated him due to his association with his handicapped wife.
     The Supreme Judicial Court found that the Massachusetts employment discrimination statute prohibited the employer from discriminating against the employee based on his wife's disability.   While the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) has long interpreted state law to protect employees from discrimination for association with members of a protected class, this is the first time the Supreme Judicial Court has weighed in on the matter, clearing up any ambiguity as to whether there is a cause of action under state law for discrimination based on association with a disabled person.
     Under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), which is federal law, employees associated with disabled individuals are explicitly protected from associational discrimination.    However, the ADA only protects employees who work for employers with 15 or more employees.  In contrast, the state employment discrimination statute covers workplaces with 6 or more employees.   Employees who work for employers with 6 to 14 employees can now rest assured that they are protected from discrimination based on their association with disabled individuals.
    Although the Supreme Judicial Court limited its holding to associational discrimination based on disability, employers would be wise to adopt practices that prohibit associational discrimination with individuals in classes based on race, gender, religion, national origin, sexual orientation and gender identity because federal courts and the MCAD have interpreted this type of discrimination to be illegal.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Elizabeth Mason

    Archives

    April 2020
    February 2015
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Employment Discrimination
    Unpaid Internships

    RSS Feed

The information contained in this website is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for consultation with legal counsel for specific legal planning or advice. The information on this website may not be up to date, is not intended as legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.  This website may be considered advertising under the Rules of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.  ©2015 by Mason Law.  All rights reserved.